Laparoscopy in infertility practice clinical appraisal

Amr Mahmoud Ismail Mahmoud;

Abstract


Laparoscopy is not a routine part of the diagnostic approach
for infertile couples. Every patient and clinical condition must
be assessed individually.
Regarding tubal occlusion, laparoscopy is recommended
when HSG reveals a bilateral obstruction. Laparoscopy can be
postponed until at least 10 months after a normal patency or
unilateral obstruction is revealed by HSG, particularly in
females < 36 years of age with normal ovarian reserves. In
patients with a history of tuberculosis or severe pelvic
infection, laparoscopy should be considered as a first-step
approach instead of HSG because in these clinical conditions,
tubal morphology and fimbria functional capacity are more
important than demonstrating tubal patency.
Further randomised controlled trials are warranted to
determine whether laparoscopy with IUI should be performed
and whether this procedure should be performed before or
after IUI. Clinicians should consider the option of diagnostic
laparoscopy before IUI in patients with a history of pelvic
infection, ectopic pregnancy, tubal surgery or symptoms of
endometriosis.
In patients with minimal and mild endometriosis,
laparoscopic resection–ablation of endometriosis focal points
or adhesions may enhance fecundity in the follow up period
and may improve the outcome of subsequent IVF/ICSI
treatment in infertile women.
Laparoscopy and Infertility
61
If an ovarian endometrioma 4 or 5 cm in diameter is present,
it is debatable that laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy is
recommended to histologically confirm the diagnosis, reduce
the risk of infection, improve access to follicles and possibly
improve ovarian response, as this may affect the ovarian
follicle reserve, considering that an endometrioma often is a
pseudocyst with a wall consisting of normal ovarian cortex.
For infertile women who have stage III/IV endometriosis
and who have previously had one or more operations for
infertility, IVF-ET is a better therapeutic option than another
operation for infertility.
More RCTs have to evaluate the effects of diagnostic
laparoscopy after failed ovulation induction, failed ovarian
stimulation , IUI or failed ART cycles; however, at least 50%
of patient pathologies, such as endometriosis or adhesions,
can be detected if laparoscopy is performed. In addition, no
evidence suggests that laparoscopy with adhesiolysis before
ART increases the pregnancy rate in ART cycles.
A hydrosalpinx negatively affects reproductive outcomes.
Laparoscopic Clip of the tube is indicated in the case of an
ultra-sound-visible hydrosalpinx. The effect of laparoscopic
surgery is more predominant in the presence of a bilateral
hydrosalpinx. In selected cases with tubal factor infertility,
laparoscopic salpingostomy may be indicated, which offers the
advantage of natural conception


Other data

Title Laparoscopy in infertility practice clinical appraisal
Other Titles استخدام منظار البطن فى علاج العقم
Authors Amr Mahmoud Ismail Mahmoud
Issue Date 2014

Attached Files

File SizeFormat
G4996.pdf406 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check



Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.