A Comparative Study of Three Diagnostic Techniques in the Evaluation of Ejaculatory Duct Obstruction
Amr Mohamed Abdel Raheem;
Abstract
The diagnosis of ejaculatory duct obstruction (EDO) is of
importance since it is a surgically correctable cause of male infertility. In
this study, TRUS guided seminal vesicle aspiration, seminal
vesiculography, and cyst aspiration and dye injection were used to
confirm TRUS findings of EDO. Out of 35 patients diagnosed by TRUS
as having EDO, only 23 were confirmed to have EDO using these
techniques. In conclusion, TRUS is a useful screening tool for EDO;
however a TRUS diagnosis of EDO needs further confirmation by TRUS
guided techniques. Furthermore, these techniques may have a therapeutic
potential.
importance since it is a surgically correctable cause of male infertility. In
this study, TRUS guided seminal vesicle aspiration, seminal
vesiculography, and cyst aspiration and dye injection were used to
confirm TRUS findings of EDO. Out of 35 patients diagnosed by TRUS
as having EDO, only 23 were confirmed to have EDO using these
techniques. In conclusion, TRUS is a useful screening tool for EDO;
however a TRUS diagnosis of EDO needs further confirmation by TRUS
guided techniques. Furthermore, these techniques may have a therapeutic
potential.
Other data
| Title | A Comparative Study of Three Diagnostic Techniques in the Evaluation of Ejaculatory Duct Obstruction | Other Titles | مقارنة لثلاث وسائل لتشخيص حالات انسداد قنوات القذف | Authors | Amr Mohamed Abdel Raheem | Issue Date | 2010 |
Attached Files
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| عمرو محمد عبد الرحيم.pdf | 155.14 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Similar Items from Core Recommender Database
Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.