COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN MODIFIED INTRAFASCIAL LAPAROSCOPIC SEMM HYSTERECTOMY AND ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY

AHMED MOHAMED AHMED AWADALLA;

Abstract


The first laparoscopic hysterectomy was done by Harry
Reich (Reich eta/., 1989).


Semm in (1991) introduced the C.I.S.H technique; it was the first laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy in the medical literature.


Laparoscopic hysterectomy Is already gammg momentum in comparison to traditional methods, growing number of gynecologists have recognized the advantages of laparoscopy over laparotomy (Pelosi and Pelosi Ill, 1992).


The C.I.S.H technique preserves the full blood supply to the lower pelvis, and this is of particular important for older patients. Perhaps this is the first step in the prophylaxis against prolapse (Semm, 1996).


Classical intrafascial Semm hysterectomy has contributed to revival of interest of subtotal hysterectomy a procedure which become nearly abandoned (Swartz, 1994).


The aim of our study was to compare between a modification of the laparoscopic C.I.S.H called laparoscopic M.I.S.H and Total abdominal hysterectomy.


Other data

Title COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN MODIFIED INTRAFASCIAL LAPAROSCOPIC SEMM HYSTERECTOMY AND ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY
Other Titles المفارنة بين استئصال الرحم عن طريق المنظار الجراحى باستخدام طريقة " زم " المعدلة واستئصال الرحم من البطن
Authors AHMED MOHAMED AHMED AWADALLA
Issue Date 2001

Attached Files

File SizeFormat
B5373.pdf1.39 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check

views 4 in Shams Scholar


Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.