Effects of Magnesium Versus Neostigmine as adjuvant to Lidocaine in Local Intravenous Anesthesia

Hany Magdy Fahim;

Abstract


Intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) is one of the safest and most consistent modes of regional anesthesia for short procedures on upper extremity. In spite of this, it has been limited by tourniquet pain, and lack of ability to offer postoperative analgesia. The best intravenous regional anesthesia solution should have the following characteristics: fast onset, low dose of local anesthetic, decreased tourniquet pain, and extended post deflation analgesia. Right now, this may merely be reached by adding adjuncts to local anesthetics with limited accomplishment.
Neostigmine is a choline esterase inhibitor whose analgesic effect can be explained by neuronal hyperpolarization and by modulation of nitric oxide pathways .
The analgesic effect of magnesium can be explained by being a NMDA receptor antagonist. It has a Ca channel inhibitory effect which proved to have antinociptive effect. Also magnesium is a Nitric Oxide donor that induce vasodilation that protect vascular endothelium from Tourniquet induced ischemia.
The aim of this study is to compare the analgesic efficacy of magnesium and neostigmine when added to lidocaine in modified Bier’s block used in hand and wrist surgeries.


Other data

Title Effects of Magnesium Versus Neostigmine as adjuvant to Lidocaine in Local Intravenous Anesthesia
Authors Hany Magdy Fahim
Issue Date 2013

Attached Files

File SizeFormat
J6834.pdf471.32 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check

views 1 in Shams Scholar
downloads 4 in Shams Scholar


Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.