Comparison of Subcuticular Non absorbable Suture and staples in Cesarean Skin Closure: A Randomized Controlled

Aml Abd-Elnaser Alkelani;

Abstract


Many methods are available to the surgeon for apposition of wounds, including the use of non-suture materials (e.g., staples, adhesives, and clips) as well as a variety of suture materials and methods. The ideal closure for surgical incisions should be fast and easy to perform, provide optimal wound apposition with sufficient but not excessive tension, and offer a satisfactory cosmetic result for the surgeon and the patient.
Conflicting evidence exists regarding the ideal method of skin closure following abdominal surgery. Choice of skin closure according to experience and the patients clinical presentation to surgery.
The current study aimed on assessing cesarean wound complication after skin closure with surgical staples compared with no absorbable subcuticular suture. The study was a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial carried on262womenpresented to Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital, and scheduled for caesarean delivery in the period from March 2016 till September 2016.
A total of two hundred sixty two women were randomly divided into subcuticular group (n=131) and stapler group (n=131) according to skin closure at cesarean


Other data

Title Comparison of Subcuticular Non absorbable Suture and staples in Cesarean Skin Closure: A Randomized Controlled
Other Titles مقارنة بين غلق الجلد بواسطة الخياطة تحت الأدمة مقابل التدبيس في العمليات القيصرية
Authors Aml Abd-Elnaser Alkelani
Issue Date 2017

Attached Files

File SizeFormat
j2303.pdf1.35 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check

views 3 in Shams Scholar
downloads 3 in Shams Scholar


Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.