COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN INTRAVENOUS PARACETAMOL AND PETHIDINE AS POST-CESAREAN SECTION ANALGESIA

Sameh Fathy Gad Elseed;

Abstract


ain is defined as “an unpleasant sensory and emotional
experience of actual or potential tissue damage or an
experience expressed in such terms” (Merskey and Bogduk,
1994).
Pain is classified into three different types: inflammatory,
neuropathic and dysfunctional pain (Basbaum et al., 2009;
Woolf, 2010). Although this kind of classification schematizes
and facilitates our clinical approach to treating pain, there is a
large interindividual variability in the response of analgesics
when administered to patients (Allegri et al., 2012).
While there have been significant advancements in
options for pain assessment and therapy, effective postoperative
pain management remains a frequent dilemma for patients and
clinicians (Diaz and Flood, 2006).
Effective pain management improves patient satisfaction,
decreases hospital stay, and shortens recovery of the
postsurgical patient. The sequelae of inadequate postoperative
pain management include: hospital re-admission, prolonged
hospitalization, compromised prognosis, and increased
morbidity secondary to immobility and pulmonary dysfunction
(Carli et al., 2002).
Management of acute pain after cesarean section has
evolved considerably over the past decade. The general approach
P
Summary
-


Other data

Title COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN INTRAVENOUS PARACETAMOL AND PETHIDINE AS POST-CESAREAN SECTION ANALGESIA
Other Titles دراسة مقارنة بين الباراسيتامول والبثيدين عن طريق الحقن الوريدى كمسكن فى مرحلة ما بعد الولادة القيصرية
Authors Sameh Fathy Gad Elseed
Issue Date 2014

Attached Files

File SizeFormat
g6069.pdf277.95 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check

views 4 in Shams Scholar
downloads 2 in Shams Scholar


Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.