Prostate Sparing Cystectomy versus Nerve Sparing Radical Cystectomy in Treatment of Invasive Bladder Cancer (A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study)

Mohamed Mahmoud Abdelfatah Zaza;

Abstract


Nerve sparing cystectomy was described in the early eighties to improve functional results and potency, in early nineties prostate sparing cystectomy was described to improve both continence and potency without jeopardizing the main aim of ontological sur


Other data

Title Prostate Sparing Cystectomy versus Nerve Sparing Radical Cystectomy in Treatment of Invasive Bladder Cancer (A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study)
Other Titles دراسة مقارنة بين استئصال المثانة مع الحفاظ على البروستاتا والاستئصال الجذرى للمثانة مع الحفاظ على الحزمة العصبية (دراسة مقارنة عشوائية)
Authors Mohamed Mahmoud Abdelfatah Zaza
Keywords Prostate Sparing Cystectomy versus Nerve Sparing Radical Cystectomy in Treatment of Invasive Bladder Cancer (A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study)
Issue Date 2013
Description 
Nerve sparing cystectomy was described in the early eighties to improve functional results and potency, in early nineties prostate sparing cystectomy was described to improve both continence and potency without jeopardizing the main aim of ontological sur

Attached Files

File SizeFormat
114227a5227.pdf565.41 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check

views 4 in Shams Scholar


Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.