Comparative Study between Ultrasound-Guided and Conventional Method of Epidural Anesthesia

Kotb Mohamed Kotb Ahmed;

Abstract


Lumbar epidural anesthesia is a commonly performed anesthetic and/or analgesic technique. The use of regional anesthesia, when possible, has proven to be safer and more effective than general anesthesia. It decreases morbidity and mortality, provides better postoperative analgesia, is cost effective, as well as it has less postoperative complications. However, neuroaxial blocks can occasionally be challenging to perform, particularly if the spinal anatomy is altered or obscured by factors such as obesity, spinal deformities, or previous spine surgery. Technical difficulty can result in procedural failure, suboptimal epidural analgesia, and increased needle trauma. It may also increase the risk of both minor and major complications such as postdural puncture headache, backache, epidural hematoma and spinal cord injury.
The aim of the present study was to compare ultrasound guidance for pre procedure identification of epidural space, real-time ultrasound guided and conventional landmark techniques.


Other data

Title Comparative Study between Ultrasound-Guided and Conventional Method of Epidural Anesthesia
Other Titles دراسة مقارنة بين التخدير خارج الأم الجافية باستخدام الموجات فوق الصوتية والطريقة التقليدية
Authors Kotb Mohamed Kotb Ahmed
Issue Date 2017

Attached Files

File SizeFormat
J7152.pdf901.43 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check



Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.