Residual Liver Volume as a Predictive Value for Donor Outcome in Adult Right Lobe Living Donor Liver Transplant
Mostafa Omar Abdel Aziz;
Abstract
SUMMARY
ight lobe liver donation is a widely accepted procedure
that results in the expansion of the indication for LDLT to
adults and elder children. However, remnant liver size and
anatomical variations in the biliary tree represent important risk
factors for postoperative complications.
The incidence of severe hepatic dysfunction and
infection following liver resection increased significantly with
smaller RLV. There are several factors affecting donors
complication rate in donors such as demographic data,
volumetric data, operative techniques and postoperative care
and follow up.
Although that small Functioning Residual Liver Volume
(FRLV) tends to regenerate more and faster, confirming that a
larger resections may lead to a greater promotion of liver
regeneration in patients with optimal conditions in terms of
body habitus, preoperative liver function tests, and glucose
level
Regeneration of liver occurs in 3 phases: early phase of
rapid regeneration occurring in the first 2 weeks postoperatively
which is associated with vascular engorgement. The second phase
takes place 1±2 months postoperatively, and is characterized by a
decrease in liver volume that is thought to be associated with the
normalization of the vascular engorgement and resolution of
R
Summary
90
tissue edema. In the final phase, there is a slow increase in liver
volume. Mechanisms of liver regeneration are highly
complicated dependent on molecular pathway with specific
stop signal.
In the past, several surgeons documented the accepted
lower safety margin of donor remnant liver volume might be
30% of the total liver volume in LDLT, Otherwise, a tragedy
caused by an extremely small remnant liver would occur
Even though the settled limit of remnant liver volume
was at 35%. There have been devastating consequences after
living liver donation around the world, most of which occurred
after right hepatic donation.
So for issue of donor safety we studied the RLV with
higher percentages to emphasize in effect of RLV on donor
liver function postoperatively, donor complication and donor
welfare.
The issue of donor is mainly not morbidity, the world is
now to donor welfare so in order to minimize complications as
possible, so we studied donors with larger RLV.
ight lobe liver donation is a widely accepted procedure
that results in the expansion of the indication for LDLT to
adults and elder children. However, remnant liver size and
anatomical variations in the biliary tree represent important risk
factors for postoperative complications.
The incidence of severe hepatic dysfunction and
infection following liver resection increased significantly with
smaller RLV. There are several factors affecting donors
complication rate in donors such as demographic data,
volumetric data, operative techniques and postoperative care
and follow up.
Although that small Functioning Residual Liver Volume
(FRLV) tends to regenerate more and faster, confirming that a
larger resections may lead to a greater promotion of liver
regeneration in patients with optimal conditions in terms of
body habitus, preoperative liver function tests, and glucose
level
Regeneration of liver occurs in 3 phases: early phase of
rapid regeneration occurring in the first 2 weeks postoperatively
which is associated with vascular engorgement. The second phase
takes place 1±2 months postoperatively, and is characterized by a
decrease in liver volume that is thought to be associated with the
normalization of the vascular engorgement and resolution of
R
Summary
90
tissue edema. In the final phase, there is a slow increase in liver
volume. Mechanisms of liver regeneration are highly
complicated dependent on molecular pathway with specific
stop signal.
In the past, several surgeons documented the accepted
lower safety margin of donor remnant liver volume might be
30% of the total liver volume in LDLT, Otherwise, a tragedy
caused by an extremely small remnant liver would occur
Even though the settled limit of remnant liver volume
was at 35%. There have been devastating consequences after
living liver donation around the world, most of which occurred
after right hepatic donation.
So for issue of donor safety we studied the RLV with
higher percentages to emphasize in effect of RLV on donor
liver function postoperatively, donor complication and donor
welfare.
The issue of donor is mainly not morbidity, the world is
now to donor welfare so in order to minimize complications as
possible, so we studied donors with larger RLV.
Other data
| Title | Residual Liver Volume as a Predictive Value for Donor Outcome in Adult Right Lobe Living Donor Liver Transplant | Other Titles | تاثير الحجم المتبقى من الكبد كقيمة تنبؤية على نتائج المتبرع بالفص الأيمن لزراعة الكبد من متبرع حى | Authors | Mostafa Omar Abdel Aziz | Issue Date | 2016 |
Attached Files
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| G13315.pdf | 229.92 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Similar Items from Core Recommender Database
Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.