Comparison Between Complete Revascularization in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Culprit-Only Revascularization
Walid Omar Ahmed Omar;
Abstract
Summary
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (p-PCI) has become the treatment of choice for patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) when it can be performed expeditiously by an experienced team. (1 – 6) The goal
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (p-PCI) has become the treatment of choice for patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) when it can be performed expeditiously by an experienced team. (1 – 6) The goal
Other data
| Title | Comparison Between Complete Revascularization in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Culprit-Only Revascularization | Other Titles | دراسة التوسيع الكامل للشرايين التاجية مقارنة بالتوسيع التحفظى فى حالات التداخل الاولى فى مرضى الاحتشاء الحاد لعضلة القلب | Authors | Walid Omar Ahmed Omar | Keywords | Comparison Between Complete Revascularization in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Culprit-Only Revascularization | Issue Date | 2012 | Description | Summary Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (p-PCI) has become the treatment of choice for patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) when it can be performed expeditiously by an experienced team. (1 – 6) The goal |
Recommend this item
Similar Items from Core Recommender Database
Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.