LIBERAL VERSUS RESTRICTED EPISIOTOMY

ASHRAF NASSlF MAHMOUD EL-MANTAWE;

Abstract


To compare the outcomes of the current practice ofliberal (routine) use of episiotomy, to prevent perinal tears and pelvic floor relaxation, "ith a policy of restricted episiotomy done for specific fetal or/and maternal indications.


Study design :

Prospective observational stLidy.

Setting :

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Benha Faculty of

Medicine Egypt from September 1999 to June 2000.



Subjects :

297 primiparae, of the same socioeconomic class who had spontaneous vaginal deliveries of singleton, mature (37-41 weeks) fetuses, in occipita-anterior position. They included 2 groups.
1- Restricted episiotomy group : 153 primiparae in whom delivery was

conducted by the same resident who tried to avoid an episiotomy except for specific fetal/maternal indications.
2-Routine episiotomy group : 144 primiparae m whom delivery was conducted by other department residents who performed routine episiotomy to avcrid perineal tears, pelvic floor relaxation and their consequences.

Materials:

The technique of de!ivery was planned to be the same in both groups.


Other data

Title LIBERAL VERSUS RESTRICTED EPISIOTOMY
Other Titles مقارنة بين شق العجان الحر والمشروط
Authors ASHRAF NASSlF MAHMOUD EL-MANTAWE
Issue Date 2000

Attached Files

File SizeFormat
B5563.pdf766.83 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check



Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.