Role of Laparoscopy in Surgical Emergencies

Abstract

The ability to improve surgical decision-making in the acute abdomen using selective laparoscopy is now established. When the decision to operate is uncertain laparoscopy not only identifies those patients who do not require laparotomy, but also reveals those who need surgery which might otherwise have been delayed. Improvements in the management of the acute abdomen can also be achieved by other techniques such as computer-assisted diagnosis (McAdam et al, 1990) and peritoneal cytology (Stewart et al, 1988), and a combination of these with selective laparotomy would be appropriate. Initial patient assessment using a structured proforma would appear to be one of the most significant factors in the improvement of diagnostic accuracy associated with the use of computers (Gunn, 1976), and their combination with a policy of selective laparoscopy has been shown to be beneficial (Paterson-Brown et al, 1989). The ability to detect which patients are likely to benefit from laparoscopy by performing peritoneal cytology first (Vipond et al, 1990) has been shown to be helpful in reducing the number of patients who undergo a 'negative laparoscopy' (Baigrie et al, 1990). It is now time for laparoscopy to return to the bosom of general surgery from where it was conceived almost a century ago. When it does, as the developments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy would predict it will, so surgeons in training must take the earliest opportunity to become as familiar and proficient with the technique as their gynaecological colleagues have done, even if this means attending the gynaecological operating lists to do so. It is only then that the undoubted benefits of laparoscopy will be spread more widely in general surgery and particularly for the patient with acute abdominal pain.