A COMPARISON OF ORALLY ADMINISTERED MISOPROSTOL WITH VAGINALLY ADMINISTERED MISOPROSTOL FOR CERVICAL RIPENING AND LABOR INDUCTION

HANY SAAD AMIN MOHAMED;

Abstract


There are many indications for term labor inductions, including postterm pregnancy, preeclampsia,diabetes mellitus, oligohydraminos, IUFD, IUGR, abnormal antepartum fetal surveillance results. The immature cervix is the greatest barrier to labor induction


Other data

Title A COMPARISON OF ORALLY ADMINISTERED MISOPROSTOL WITH VAGINALLY ADMINISTERED MISOPROSTOL FOR CERVICAL RIPENING AND LABOR INDUCTION
Authors HANY SAAD AMIN MOHAMED
Keywords A COMPARISON OF ORALLY ADMINISTERED MISOPROSTOL WITH VAGINALLY ADMINISTERED MISOPROSTOL FOR CERVICAL RIPENING AND LABOR INDUCTION
Issue Date 2008
Description 
There are many indications for term labor inductions, including postterm pregnancy, preeclampsia,diabetes mellitus, oligohydraminos, IUFD, IUGR, abnormal antepartum fetal surveillance results. The immature cervix is the greatest barrier to labor induction

Attached Files

File SizeFormat
11772Binder1.pdf97.08 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check

views 3 in Shams Scholar
downloads 2 in Shams Scholar


Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.