Evaluation of Different Techniques for Pain Relief After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Sameh Mohammed Osman;

Abstract


Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the procedure of choice for treatment of gallstones. Pain after laparoscopy may be moderate or even severe in some patients and requires more than opioid treatment. Inadequately treated pain is a major cause of increased postoperative morbidity. The sympathetic stimulation resulting from pain can lead to tachycardia, arrhythmias, hypertension and increased myocardial strain and oxygen demands. Also, the pulmonary functions can be dramatically diminished by surgically induced pain which is usually secondary to reduced ability to cough
to expand the lungs and clear secretions.
This study was carried on sixty adult patients, ASA physical status I or II, from both sexes, scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were randomly allocated into four equal groups according to the technique used for postoperative pain relief. group I (control group) received 0.1 mg/kg IM morphine and 20 mg tenoxicam intravenously, group II (intraperitoneal group) received
20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine intraperitoneally, group III (thoracic
epidural group) received 8 mL 0.25% bupivacaine through a thoracic epidural catheter, and group IV (interpleural group) received 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine through interpleural catheter.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate and to compare the efficacy of different techniques for pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, with accompanied hemodynamic changes, respiratory rate changes, and side effects.


Other data

Title Evaluation of Different Techniques for Pain Relief After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Other Titles تقييم الطرق المختلفة لتسكين الألم بعد عملية استئصال المرارة بالمنظار
Authors Sameh Mohammed Osman
Issue Date 2002

Attached Files

File SizeFormat
O695.pdf911.18 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check

views 3 in Shams Scholar


Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.