Comparative Study between Flexible Ureteroscopy and Semirigid Ureteroscopy in Management of Upper Ureteric Stones using Laser Lithotripsy

Kerollous Nashaat Harras Soliman;

Abstract


here are various options in the management of proximal
ureteral stones, which includes medical expulsive therapy,
extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), ureteroscopy
(URS; retrograde), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL),
laparoscopy (LAP), and open surgery
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and
safety of both semirigid and flexible ureteroscopy in
management of upper ureteric stones using laser lithotripsy.
To achieve this goal, this prospective study was done at
the urology department, Ain Shams University Hospitals over
60 patients with upper ureteric stones less than 2 cm in size.
Divided into to groups 30 patients in each group. Patients in
group A were treated by semirigid ureteroscopy.while patients
in group B were treated by flexible ureteroscopy using laser
lithotripsy in both procedures.
Stone free rate was 90.0% in group A while it was 93.3%
in group B.
Mean operative time was 55.07 ± 13.24 min in Group A
while it was 64.63 ± 17.33 min in Group B.
Success rate was 76.7% in group A, while it was 90.0%
in group B.


Other data

Title Comparative Study between Flexible Ureteroscopy and Semirigid Ureteroscopy in Management of Upper Ureteric Stones using Laser Lithotripsy
Other Titles دراسة مقارنة بين منظار الحالب المرن ومنظار الحالب شبه الصلب لعلاج حصوات أعلى الحالب مستخدما ًمفتت الليزر
Authors Kerollous Nashaat Harras Soliman
Issue Date 2018

Attached Files

File SizeFormat
J8145.pdf283.68 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check

views 2 in Shams Scholar


Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.