(Electrosurgical Unipolar Vessel Sealing Versus Purohit Technique in Vaginal Hysterectomy (A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial

Alaa Mohamed Atef Abdel Malek Karim El-din;

Abstract


Literature reviews and meta-analysis show that vaginal hysterectomy should be performed in preference to abdominal hysterectomy, where possible as it has benefits; quicker return to normal activities, fewer complications, shorter operative time, less blood loss, and a shorter stay in hospital. Also, it is preferredtolaparoscopic-assistedvaginalhysterectomybecauseoffewerbladderoruretericdamageaswellasashorteroperatingtimeandlearning curve.
Bipolartechniquehasadvantagesfromsurgical,anaesthesiologyandeconomicpointofviewwithareductionoflengthofstayhospitalwithsubsequentcostreductionsinpublichealthespeciallyindevelopingcountries.Inthisperspective,duringthelastfewyears,gynaecologicsurgerytechniqueshavebeenimprovedinordertoimprovepostoperativecourse.


Other data

Title (Electrosurgical Unipolar Vessel Sealing Versus Purohit Technique in Vaginal Hysterectomy (A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial
Other Titles دراسة مقارنة ما بين الإستئصال المهبلى للرحم بإستخدام الكى الجراحى الكهربى احادى القطب
Authors Alaa Mohamed Atef Abdel Malek Karim El-din
Issue Date 2018

Attached Files

File SizeFormat
J8655.pdf449.41 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check



Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.