(Electrosurgical Unipolar Vessel Sealing Versus Purohit Technique in Vaginal Hysterectomy (A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial
Alaa Mohamed Atef Abdel Malek Karim El-din;
Abstract
Literature reviews and meta-analysis show that vaginal hysterectomy should be performed in preference to abdominal hysterectomy, where possible as it has benefits; quicker return to normal activities, fewer complications, shorter operative time, less blood loss, and a shorter stay in hospital. Also, it is preferredtolaparoscopic-assistedvaginalhysterectomybecauseoffewerbladderoruretericdamageaswellasashorteroperatingtimeandlearning curve.
Bipolartechniquehasadvantagesfromsurgical,anaesthesiologyandeconomicpointofviewwithareductionoflengthofstayhospitalwithsubsequentcostreductionsinpublichealthespeciallyindevelopingcountries.Inthisperspective,duringthelastfewyears,gynaecologicsurgerytechniqueshavebeenimprovedinordertoimprovepostoperativecourse.
Bipolartechniquehasadvantagesfromsurgical,anaesthesiologyandeconomicpointofviewwithareductionoflengthofstayhospitalwithsubsequentcostreductionsinpublichealthespeciallyindevelopingcountries.Inthisperspective,duringthelastfewyears,gynaecologicsurgerytechniqueshavebeenimprovedinordertoimprovepostoperativecourse.
Other data
| Title | (Electrosurgical Unipolar Vessel Sealing Versus Purohit Technique in Vaginal Hysterectomy (A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial | Other Titles | دراسة مقارنة ما بين الإستئصال المهبلى للرحم بإستخدام الكى الجراحى الكهربى احادى القطب | Authors | Alaa Mohamed Atef Abdel Malek Karim El-din | Issue Date | 2018 |
Recommend this item
Similar Items from Core Recommender Database
Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.