Caudal Bupivacaine versus Systemic Nalbuphine for Post-Operative Pain Management in Children Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair

Mohamed FathyAbdelmotagly;

Abstract


tudies have suggested that painful experiences and events during childhood even during infancy, may lead to long term psychological effects. Therefore pediatric anesthetists, surgeons and pharmacologists had been in a continuous search to locate a safe and effective analgesic for children (Larsson, 2001).
Inguinal herniotomy is one of the most commonly electively done procedures in children. The estimated prevalence in preterm and full term infants is 10% and 1-5% respectively. It is usually done as a daycare procedure; however most of the pediatric surgeons now recommend admission of the child for overnight if age is less than 6 months (Nazem et al., 2016). As it is a clean case, so usually patient is kept on ‘nothing per oral’ status for a short time. Oral pain killers are allowed immediately after allowing feed in post-operative period. So the main problem of pain control in these patients is in the immediate 4-6 hours post-operative period. Therefore we planned this study and compared pain control of two regimens for 8 hours post-operatively.


Other data

Title Caudal Bupivacaine versus Systemic Nalbuphine for Post-Operative Pain Management in Children Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair
Other Titles المقارنه بين استخدام عقار البيوبيفيكين في الاحصار العجزي و استخدام عقارالنالوفين بالوريدلتسكين الألم بعد جراحات اصلاح الفتق الأربي في الأطفال
Authors Mohamed FathyAbdelmotagly
Issue Date 2018

Attached Files

File SizeFormat
J8771.pdf355.72 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check

views 2 in Shams Scholar


Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.