(Clinical Trial to Compare between Different Dressing Methods on Split Thickness Graft Donor site (Conventional Method VS Ca Alginate Vs Hydrocolloid Sheet
Marihan Mamdouh Adib Shihata;
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Background: According WHO Egypt has high incidence in RTA and burn. Controversy between studies and reviews on the best dressing on donor site, while evidence support the use of moist wound dressings other centers believe that the impregnated gauze is cost effective.
Objective: Comparison between 3 types of dressings: The Conventional method (Vaseline gauze), Calcium alginate and Hydrocolloid sheets to determine which donor-site dressings are associated with the best outcomes for faster healing rate, less Pain, decreased Infection rate, healing quality and cost-effectiveness.
Background: According WHO Egypt has high incidence in RTA and burn. Controversy between studies and reviews on the best dressing on donor site, while evidence support the use of moist wound dressings other centers believe that the impregnated gauze is cost effective.
Objective: Comparison between 3 types of dressings: The Conventional method (Vaseline gauze), Calcium alginate and Hydrocolloid sheets to determine which donor-site dressings are associated with the best outcomes for faster healing rate, less Pain, decreased Infection rate, healing quality and cost-effectiveness.
Other data
| Title | (Clinical Trial to Compare between Different Dressing Methods on Split Thickness Graft Donor site (Conventional Method VS Ca Alginate Vs Hydrocolloid Sheet | Other Titles | دراسة مقارنة بين انواع الغيارات علي المناطق المانحة للرقعة الجلدية مشطورة السماكة الطريقة التقليدية باستخدام شاش الفزلين و الجينيت الكالسيوم و الهيدرو كولويد | Authors | Marihan Mamdouh Adib Shihata | Issue Date | 2018 |
Recommend this item
Similar Items from Core Recommender Database
Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.