Retroperitoneal versus Transperitoneal Laparoscopic approach for Management of Upper Ureteric Stones

Mohamed Emad El-saied El-Fiky;

Abstract


urrent options for ureteral stones include medical treatment, extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), and various endoscopic procedures, with the standard open ureterolithotomy being less frequently practiced nowadays. The use of laparoscopy in the management of ureteral stones was one of the earliest applications of laparoscopy in urology, the first report being made by Wickham in 1979. In this study we present our experience with laparoscopic ureterolithotomy comparing both transperitoneal approach and retroperitoneal approach through a prospective randomized comparative study.
Through our study we concluded that Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy is technically feasible and safe and both of its two approaches either transperitoneal or retroperitoneal are successful procedures with a success rate nearly the same in both techniques, but and based on our results through this study, we recommend the retroperitoneal approach for laparoscpic extraction of the ureteral stones due to the fact that it has the least operative time than the transperitoneal approach, getting rid of the all stone burden, lower rate of complications and a better postoperative recovery.


Other data

Title Retroperitoneal versus Transperitoneal Laparoscopic approach for Management of Upper Ureteric Stones
Other Titles إستخدام منظار البطن الجراحى لاستخراج حصوة بأعلى الحالب من خلال التجويف البريتونى مقارنة به من خلف التجويف البريتونى للبطن
Authors Mohamed Emad El-saied El-Fiky
Issue Date 2019

Attached Files

File SizeFormat
CC3131.pdf484.38 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check



Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.