COMPARISON OF PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES BETWEEN MONOPOLAR AND BIPOLAR TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF BLADDER TUMORS

Ahmed Mohamed Kassem;

Abstract


TURBT is the gold standard for the diagnosis and treatment
of NMIBC. For these reasons, monopolar and bipolar resection
can be achieved. The aim of the initial resection is to eliminate all
apparent tumors together with the underlying muscle layer of the
urinary bladder.
An important advantage of bipolar electrocautery includes
reduced blood loss due to better hemostasis which helps to shorten
the perioperative complications and postoperative recovery period
such as catheterization time and hospital stay (Mamoulakis et al,
2011).
TURBT has ordinary been performed by utilizing monopolar
electrocautery with a cutting loop. Hypotonic irrigation fluids
such as 1.5% glycine or water are essential when operating TUR
using monopolar electrocautery Excess fluid absorption,
particularly during resection of larger bladder tumors, can result in
TUR syndrome which is a potentially fatal complication. Bipolar
energy was introduced as an energy source for TURBT using
isotonic saline as an irrigation fluid (Geavlete et al, 2011).


Other data

Title COMPARISON OF PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES BETWEEN MONOPOLAR AND BIPOLAR TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF BLADDER TUMORS
Authors Ahmed Mohamed Kassem
Issue Date 2018

Attached Files

File SizeFormat
J6927.pdf324.3 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check

views 6 in Shams Scholar
downloads 1 in Shams Scholar


Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.