The Use of Chaetomium Taxa as Biocontrol Agents

Adel K. Madbouly; Marwa T. A. Abdel-Wareth;

Abstract


Crop plants suffer from many diseases caused by pathogenic fungi, bacteria and
viruses both in the field and during storage. These diseases cause significant decrease
in crops yields leading consequently to great economic losses. For a long period
ago, farmers tend to use chemical control through synthetic pesticides to control
these phytopathogens; however, these chemicals have proved to be harmful to
human health and poultry, in addition to being non-ecofriendly. Recent trends
nowadays focus on new control strategies including biological control using bioagents,
and control through the use of nanopesticides. These methods are safe, easily
applicable, economic, and ecofriendly. Biological control is an effecient alternative
way to control plant diseases (Zhang et al. 2018).
The fungal bioagents exert several antagonistic potentials against phytopathogens
directly through mycoparasitism, antibiosis, competition for nutrients and
space, and indirectly through inducing plant resistance (Vujanovic and Goh 2011).
In addition, they withstand unfavourable environmental conditions. According to
Saldajeno and Hyakumachi (2011), bioagents were normally applied singly against
most plant pathogens; however, recently several works have emphasized on using
more than one bioagent simultaneously to be more effective and a more reliable way
of biocontrol, as they will have multiple modes of action at different sites of
the host plant.
Chaetomium is one of the largest genera in Chaetomiaceae family (Fatima et al.
2016) which includes about 100 species. Chaetomium spp. exist mainly in soil, animals, and as endophytes in several plants through forming a symbiotic relationship
without causing any harm to their hosts. Chaetomin mycotoxin was recorded
for the first time from Chaetomium spp. in 1944 (Geiger et al. 1944); however, wide
variety of bioactive compounds were reported later in Chaetomium spp. such as;
orsellides (Schlörke et al. 2006), xanthenone (Pontius et al. 2008), chaetoglobins
(Ge et al. 2008), polyhydroxylated steroids (Qin et al. 2009a), azaphilones (Yamada
et al. 2011), and armochaetoglobins A–J (Chen et al. 2015). Some of these compounds
presented significant biological activities including; antifungal, anti-inflammatory,
cytotoxic, and enzyme inhibition (Li et al. 2016). Knowledge of the
antagonistic potential and modes of action of some of the biocontrol agents such as
Chaetomium spp. is highly recommended to be more effective against target pathogens
in several ways.
Several strains of Chaetomium spp. showed different in vitro and in vivo antifungal
potencies against many phytopathogens (Vitale et al. 2012) including;
Helminthosporium, Fusarium, Alternaria raphani, A. brassicicola, Phytophthora
and Pythium ultimum (Soytong et al. 2001). Later, Tomilova and Shternshis (2006)
added that Chaetomium spp. have been used successfully to control damping off
disease of sugar beet, root rot of citrus and black pepper. However, more than one
factor should be considered before manipulation of Chaetomium spp. in the field
such as the temperature of soil, moisture level and pH, because these factors affect
their antagonistic potencies and effectiveness.
Chaetomium globosum is one of the most common species growing as a saprophyte
in the rhizosphere, phyllosphere of plants and as a normal colonizer of the soil.
This species has been applied successfully in vivo to control many epidemics
of fruits such as; root rots in tangerine (Citrus reticulata Blanco) incited by P. parasitica,
in strawberry (Fragaria spp.) caused by P. cactorum, in black pepper (Piper
nigram L.) incited by P. palmivora, basal rot of corn caused by Sclerotium rolfsii,
and tomato wilt (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) incited by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp.
lycopersici (Zhang et al. 2010).
Recently, Dosen et al. (2017) pointed that C. globosum is able to produce several
species-specific metabolites such as cochliodones and chaetoglobosins. Little is
known about their human toxicity, although Udagawa et al. (1979) recorded the
intravenous toxicity of chaetoglobosins A and C in animal tests.


Other data

Title The Use of Chaetomium Taxa as Biocontrol Agents
Authors Adel K. Madbouly ; Marwa T. A. Abdel-Wareth
Keywords Chaetomium;Fungal bioagent;Biocontrol;Plant diseases
Issue Date 2020
Publisher Springer Nature
Start page 251
End page 265

Attached Files

File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
Book Chapter.pdf498.24 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy
Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check



Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.