Spinal Anesthesia Versus Popliteal and Adductor Canal Blocks for Ambulation After Pott's Fracture Surgery

Madonna Mounir Salama;

Abstract


Peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) have been extensively used in patients with poly-trauma posted for emergency surgeries and for patients with critical co-morbidities who cannot tolerate even the slightest alteration of hemodynamic status. Recently several developments have led to an increased interest in lower extremity PNBs, including recognition of transient neurological symptoms associated with spinal anesthesia and evidence of improved rehabilitation outcome with lower limb PNBs.
Complications to spinal and epidural anesthesia also include hypotension due to the vasodilatory effect of the sympathetic blockade, in addition to the rare but potentially serious risk of compressive neuraxial hematoma (Pitkänen et al., 2013).
It is desirable to provide effective anesthesia, rapid and an uneventful recovery, persistent postoperative analgesia and early ambulation to patients. Also they are ideally suited for lower limb surgeries because of the peripheral location of the surgical site and the potential to block pain pathways at multiple levels (Palkhiwala and Bhatt, 2015).
With the development of ultrasonographic imaging and neurostimulation technology, more and more anesthesiolo¬gists


Other data

Title Spinal Anesthesia Versus Popliteal and Adductor Canal Blocks for Ambulation After Pott's Fracture Surgery
Other Titles مقارنة التخدير النخاعي بالتخدير الطرفي للاعصاب بالقناة المأبضية والموصلة من حيث سرعة التحرك بعد جراحة كسر اسفل عظمة مشبك القدم
Authors Madonna Mounir Salama
Issue Date 2019

Attached Files

File SizeFormat
CC6183.pdf480.18 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check



Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.