Comparative Evaluation Of Gutta Flow Bioseal Versus Two Different Root Canal Sealers. (In Vitro Study)
Menna Allah Ali Abd El Daiem Ali;
Abstract
Bioceramic materials induce physiological closure of the root canal by hard tissue which ensures non problematic and long term function of the root. Moreover, bioceramic sealers are biocompatible, and do not trigger adverse reactions such as irritation, allergy, inflammation, toxicity or carcinogenicity. Lately, a new attempt has been carried to combine the expansion property of silicon based sealers, better penetration of cold gutta percha particles, and biomineralization of bioactive glass and introduced a new sealer” GuttaFlow Bioseal” in market which is the material of study.
The aim of this study was to compare a silicon based sealer “GuttaFlow Bioseal”, MTA based sealer “MTA-Fillapex” and resin based sealer “AH Plus” with regards to their bioactivity, adaptation on dentin surface and fracture resistance of roots after obturation.
The aim of this study was to compare a silicon based sealer “GuttaFlow Bioseal”, MTA based sealer “MTA-Fillapex” and resin based sealer “AH Plus” with regards to their bioactivity, adaptation on dentin surface and fracture resistance of roots after obturation.
Other data
| Title | Comparative Evaluation Of Gutta Flow Bioseal Versus Two Different Root Canal Sealers. (In Vitro Study) | Other Titles | مقارنة بين مادة الجاتافلو بيوسيل و نوعين أخرين من السمنتات اللاصقة على العاج الجذري (دراسة فى المختبر) | Authors | Menna Allah Ali Abd El Daiem Ali | Issue Date | 2019 |
Attached Files
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CC2538.pdf | 918.62 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Similar Items from Core Recommender Database
Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.