Retrograde intramedullary nail versus External fixator in arthrodesis of Charcot ankle: A Systematic Review
Ahmad Muhammad Abdel Aziz Borham;
Abstract
There is evidence that IMN could yield better results than EF for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. Based on this review, IMN generated higher rate of fusion with lesser complications than EF. In the clinical context of ulcer presence on the plantar aspect of the foot, the EF might be a better solution, particularly in diabetic patients.
Other data
| Title | Retrograde intramedullary nail versus External fixator in arthrodesis of Charcot ankle: A Systematic Review | Other Titles | مراجعة منهجية لطريقة سمكرة مفصل الكاحل (شاركوت) باستخدام المسمار النخاعي المرتجع مقابل المثبت الخارجي | Authors | Ahmad Muhammad Abdel Aziz Borham | Issue Date | 2020 |
Attached Files
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BB1101.pdf | 1.29 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Similar Items from Core Recommender Database
Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.