A Single-arm Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Cabazitaxel and Cisplatin Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Urinary Bladder

Challapalli, Amarnath; Masson, Susan; White, Paul; Dailami, Narges; Pearson, Sylvia; Rowe, Edward; Koupparis, Anthony; Oxley, Jon; Abdelaziz, Ahmed Hassan; Ash-Miles, Janice; Bravo, Alicia; Foulstone, Emily; Perks, Claire; Holly, Jeff; Persad, Raj; Bahl, Amit;

Abstract


Introduction: Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy improves survival in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. However, response rates and survival remain suboptimal. We evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of cisplatin plus cabazitaxel. Methods: A phase II single-arm trial was designed to recruit at least 26 evaluable patients. This would give 80% power to detect the primary endpoint, an objective response rate defined as a pathologic complete response plus partial response (pathologic downstaging), measured by pathologic staging at cystectomy (p = 0.35 and p = 0.60, α = 0.05). Results: Objective response was seen in 15 of 26 evaluable patients (57.7%) and more than one- third of patients achieved a pathologic complete response (9/26; 34.6%). Seventy-eight percent of the patients (21/27) completed all cycles of treatment, with only 6.7% of the reported adverse events being graded 3 or 4. There were 6 treatment-related serious adverse event reported, but no suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions. In the patients who achieved an objective response, the median progression-free survival and overall survival were not reached (median follow-up of 41.5 months). In contrast, the median progression-free survival (7.2 months) and overall survival (16.9 months) were significantly worse (P = .001, log-rank) in patients who did not achieve an objective response. Conclusion: Cabazitaxel plus cisplatin for neoadjuvant treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer can be considered a well-tolerated and effective regimen before definitive therapy with higher rates (57.7%) of objective response, comparing favorably to that with of cisplatin/gemcitabine (23%–26%). These results warrant further evaluation in a phase III study. Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy improves survival in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. However, response rates and survival remain suboptimal. We sought to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of cisplatin in combination with cabazitaxel in this patient group. This combination can be considered well-tolerated and efficacious with higher response rates (57.7%), which compares favorably to that with cisplatin/gemcitabine (23%–26%). 0 1


Other data

Title A Single-arm Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Cabazitaxel and Cisplatin Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Urinary Bladder
Authors Challapalli, Amarnath; Masson, Susan; White, Paul; Dailami, Narges; Pearson, Sylvia; Rowe, Edward; Koupparis, Anthony; Oxley, Jon; Abdelaziz, Ahmed Hassan ; Ash-Miles, Janice; Bravo, Alicia; Foulstone, Emily; Perks, Claire; Holly, Jeff; Persad, Raj; Bahl, Amit
Keywords Adverse events;Bladder cancer;Neoadjuvant chemotherapy;Pathologic complete response;Radical cystectomy
Issue Date 1-Jan-2021
Journal Clinical Genitourinary Cancer 
Volume 19
Issue 4
Start page 325
End page 332
ISSN 15587673
DOI 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.02.001
PubMed ID 33727028
Scopus ID 2-s2.0-85102450777

Attached Files

File Description SizeFormat
Neoadjuvant Cabazitaxel ,The paper.pdf494.62 kBUnknownView/Open
Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check

Citations 1 in pubmed
Citations 3 in scopus


Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.