Cesarean section incisional infiltration with lidocaine and Epinephrine versus Lidocaine alone in reducing postoperative pain. A randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial

Hend Maher Afifi;

Abstract


esarean section delivery is becoming more frequent. Childbirth is an emotion-filled event and the mother needs to bond with her newborn baby as early as possible. Any intervention that leads to improvement in pain relief is worthy of investigation (Bamigboye, 2010).
The progressive increase in the incidence of caesarean birth has been a notable feature of contemporary obstetric practice and caesarean delivery is now the most frequent major surgical procedure performed in obstetrics (Martin et al., 2002).
According to the American Society of Anesthesiologist practice guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting, acute pain is defined as pain present in a surgical patient after a procedure. The WHO described pain relief as a human right. Poorly managed post operative pain can lead to complications and prolonged rehabilitation. Uncontrolled acute pain is associated with the development of chronic pain with reduction in quality of life. Appropriate pain relief, reduces hospital costs, and increased patient satisfaction. (Kehlet H etal.,2001)


Other data

Title Cesarean section incisional infiltration with lidocaine and Epinephrine versus Lidocaine alone in reducing postoperative pain. A randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial
Other Titles حقن الليدوكايين والإبينفرين في مقابل حقن الليدوكايين وحده داخل جرح العملية القيصرية في الحد من الألم بعد الولادة: دراسة إكلينيكية عشوائية ضابطة مزدوجة التعمية
Authors Hend Maher Afifi
Issue Date 2020

Attached Files

File SizeFormat
BB3250.pdf735.43 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check

views 2 in Shams Scholar


Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.