Clinical trial comparing autogenous fascia lata sling and gore-tex suspension in bilateral congenital ptosis

Elsamkary M.; Roshdy M.;

Abstract


© 2016 Elsamkary and Roshdy. Purpose: To study the effect of autogenous fascia lata sling (AFLS) versus Gore-Tex suspension (GTS) regarding the functional and aesthetic outcomes in patients with bilateral congenital ptosis. Patients and methods: A prospective comparative randomized single-center study enrolled 110 patients with bilateral congenital ptosis. One group (n=55) underwent AFLS and the second group (n=55) underwent GTS. Exclusion criteria were good levator function, absent Bell’s phenomenon, and abnormal ocular motility. Follow-up period was 2 years. Functional outcome was measured from digital photos by analysis of upper eyelid margin position relative to the superior limbus and classified as very good ( < 3 mm), good (3-5 mm), poor ( > 5 mm), and recurrent. Aesthetic outcome was assessed in terms of lid contour, symmetry of eyelid height, and lid crease presence. Complications were also reported. Results: Failure rate (recurrence and complications) was less in AFLS (P=0.035). Symmetrical lid height and good contour were more frequently attained by AFLS (P=0.007 and 0.047, respectively). However, the frequency of very good, good, poor, recurrence, lagopthalmos, ectropion, infection, and formed lid crease individually showed no statistically significant difference (P=0.252, 0.482, 1, 0.489, 0.438, 1, 0.618, and 0.506, respectively). Conclusion: AFLS is a better choice in surgery for patients with bilateral congenital ptosis because it has fewer complications and a lesser recurrence rate than GTS.


Other data

Title Clinical trial comparing autogenous fascia lata sling and gore-tex suspension in bilateral congenital ptosis
Authors Elsamkary M. ; Roshdy M. 
Issue Date 7-Mar-2016
Journal Clinical Ophthalmology 
DOI 10.2147/OPTH.S95383
PubMed ID 27022237
Scopus ID 2-s2.0-84960423594

Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check

Citations 6 in pubmed
Citations 12 in scopus
views 15 in Shams Scholar


Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.