Rotating Scheimpflug Imaging Indices in Different Grades of Keratoconus

Wahba SS; Roshdy, Maged; Elkitkat RS; Naguib KM;

Abstract


© 2016 Sherine S. Wahba et al. Purpose. To evaluate accuracy of various Keratoconus (KC) screening indices, in relation to Topographic Keratoconus (TKC) grading. Setting. Al Watany Eye Hospital, Cairo, Egypt. Methods. Data of 103 normal (group 1) and 73 KC eyes (group 2), imaged by Pentacam (branded as Allegro Oculyzer), were analysed. Group 2 was divided into 2a: 14 eyes (TKC = 1, early KC), 2b: 25 eyes (TKC = 1 to 2 or 2, moderate KC), and 2c: 34 eyes (TKC = 2 to 3 up to 4, severe KC). Participants were followed up for six years to confirm diagnosis. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was calculated for evaluated curvature, elevation, and pachymetry indices with various reference shapes at different diameters. Results. When comparing normal to KC eyes, ten indices had significantly higher AUROC. Only five of them had significantly higher AUROC in early KC compared to normal corneas: Pachymetry Progression Index- (PPI-) Maximum (Max), Ambrósio's Relational Thickness- (ART-) Max, PPI-Max minus PPI-Minimum (Min), central corneal thickness (CCT), and diagonal decentration of thinnest point from the apex (AUROC = 0.690, 0.690, 0.687, 0.683, and 0.674, resp.). Conclusion. Generally, ten pachymetry and elevation-based indices had significantly higher AUROC. Five indices had statistically significant high AUROC when comparing early KC to normal corneas.


Other data

Title Rotating Scheimpflug Imaging Indices in Different Grades of Keratoconus
Authors Wahba SS ; Roshdy, Maged ; Elkitkat RS ; Naguib KM 
Issue Date 2016
Journal Journal of Ophthalmology 
DOI 6392472
http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/27579178
PMC4992767
2016
10.1155/2016/6392472
PubMed ID 27579178
Scopus ID 2-s2.0-84984678852

Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check

Citations 17 in pubmed
Citations 31 in scopus
views 13 in Shams Scholar


Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.