Intravenous Nadroparine Versus Unfractionated Heparin in patients Undergoing Elective percuteaneous Coronary Intervention
Amr Mahmoud Ahmed;
Abstract
The conventional unfracionated heparin has many drawbacks in the management of patients undergoing pCI, where the LMWH may offer several advantages over the UFH.
Our present study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of using a single intravenous dos
Our present study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of using a single intravenous dos
Other data
| Title | Intravenous Nadroparine Versus Unfractionated Heparin in patients Undergoing Elective percuteaneous Coronary Intervention | Other Titles | دراسة استخدام عقار النادروبارين بالوريد مقارنة بالهيبارين الغيرمجزأ أثناء إجراء القسطرة التداخلية لمرضى قصور الشرايين التاجية | Authors | Amr Mahmoud Ahmed | Keywords | Intravenous Nadroparine Versus Unfractionated Heparin in patients Undergoing Elective percuteaneous Coronary Intervention | Issue Date | 2012 | Description | The conventional unfracionated heparin has many drawbacks in the management of patients undergoing pCI, where the LMWH may offer several advantages over the UFH. Our present study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of using a single intravenous dos |
Recommend this item
Similar Items from Core Recommender Database
Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.