PULESD MAGNTIC FIFLD VERSUS TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL NERVE STAIMULATION IN TREATMENT OF LOW BACK DYSFUNCTION
AHMED MOHAMED MOSTAFA;
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Chronic low back dyfunction is reported to be amajor health problem worldwide. Purposes: TO investigate and compare the effecacy of pulsed magnetic field and transcutaneous electrical never stimulation in
Background: Chronic low back dyfunction is reported to be amajor health problem worldwide. Purposes: TO investigate and compare the effecacy of pulsed magnetic field and transcutaneous electrical never stimulation in
Other data
| Title | PULESD MAGNTIC FIFLD VERSUS TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL NERVE STAIMULATION IN TREATMENT OF LOW BACK DYSFUNCTION | Authors | AHMED MOHAMED MOSTAFA | Keywords | PULESD MAGNTIC FIFLD VERSUS TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL NERVE STAIMULATION IN TREATMENT OF LOW BACK DYSFUNCTION | Issue Date | 2008 | Description | Abstract Background: Chronic low back dyfunction is reported to be amajor health problem worldwide. Purposes: TO investigate and compare the effecacy of pulsed magnetic field and transcutaneous electrical never stimulation in |
Recommend this item
Similar Items from Core Recommender Database
Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.