CLINICAL RELIABILITY OF DIGITAL IMAGING AS A SHADE SELECTION TOOL VERSUS VISUAL AND INSTRUMENTAL METHODS
AHMED MOHAMED ZIADA;
Abstract
SUMMARY The hypothesis of this study was using digital imaging in shade selection considered reliable compared to visual and instrumental methods as widely used methods in shade selection. The current study investigated the agreement and ability of the di
Other data
| Title | CLINICAL RELIABILITY OF DIGITAL IMAGING AS A SHADE SELECTION TOOL VERSUS VISUAL AND INSTRUMENTAL METHODS | Other Titles | الأعتماد علي التصوير الرقمي كأداه لأختيار الظل مقارنة بالطريقة البصرية و الأدوية | Authors | AHMED MOHAMED ZIADA | Keywords | CLINICAL RELIABILITY OF DIGITAL IMAGING AS A SHADE SELECTION TOOL VERSUS VISUAL AND INSTRUMENTAL METHODS | Issue Date | 2011 | Description | SUMMARY The hypothesis of this study was using digital imaging in shade selection considered reliable compared to visual and instrumental methods as widely used methods in shade selection. The current study investigated the agreement and ability of the di |
Attached Files
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binder1.pdf | 223.96 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Similar Items from Core Recommender Database
Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.