COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION AND POSTERO-LATERAL FUSION IN SPINAL FIXATION IN CASES OF SPONDYLOLISTHESIS.

TAMER IBRAHIM MOHAMED ORIEF;

Abstract


This work evaluated the methods used in posterior spinal fusion weather Posterior Lumbar lnterbody Fusion (PLIF) or Postero-lateral Fusion in cases of spondylolisthesis managed by spinal fixation. The efficacy was assessed according to the post-operative clinical and radiological outcomes for four months.



Twenty patients were included in this study. All cases were subjected to complete clinical assessment, laboratory investigations and radiological assessment. Failure of conservative treatment and/or presence of neurological deficit were the indications of surgery.



All the studied cases were of single level, mobile, first and second degree spondylolisthesis. Ten cases were selected to perform postero-lateral fusion and another ten cases were selected to perform PLIF. Internal fixation was done for all the studied cases of both groups.


Other data

Title COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION AND POSTERO-LATERAL FUSION IN SPINAL FIXATION IN CASES OF SPONDYLOLISTHESIS.
Other Titles دراسة مقارنة بين اندماج الفقرات القطنية الخلفى والاندماج الخلفى الجانبي فى تثيبت الفقرات فى حالات الأنزلاق الفقاري
Authors TAMER IBRAHIM MOHAMED ORIEF
Issue Date 2002

Attached Files

File SizeFormat
B6418.pdf1.45 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check

views 4 in Shams Scholar


Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.