THE RECENT ROLE OF MR UROGRAPHY IN FOLLOW UP OF URINARY DIVERSION PATIENTS
Mostafa Mohammed Hassan Ghaly;
Abstract
Radical cystectomy is a major surgical procedure with high risk of development of complications requiring proper preoperative preparation; follow up at both the early and late postoperative period.
Formal guidelines for follow-up after urinary diversion has not yet been established so what we suggest is a follow-up strategy addressing early and late postoperative complications.
An initial radiological assessment in the first three months is advised followed by a constant interval (six months) radiological follow ups.
The choice of the proper imaging modality used varies for each patient depends on inputs from clinical, laboratory & operative data as well as different specifications of each imaging modality.
The role of radiologist includes:
• Pre-operative
Evaluation of the urinary tract to have a baseline evaluation of the upper urinary tract. This would be helpful in monitoring changes that may develop in the future.
• Early postoperative
- Determine the integrity of the diversion.
- Detect any complications such as leaks from the pouch or at the sites of the anastomosis.
• late postoperative
- Assess the capacity of the reservoirs.
- Presence of ureteric reflux
- Monitor upper tract changes.
- Detect potential complications of the procedure.
(Hanna and Badawy, 2009)
The used Imaging studies include:
• Ultrasound is the basic initial study being very useful in monitoring the kidneys and detecting hydronephrotic changes.
• Intravenous urography (IVU) and retrograde loopogramorpouchography were the two classic imaging methods used for evaluating the urinary diversions.
• CTU is a superior alternative to IVU allowing excellent evaluation of the urinary tract and the integrity of the urinary diversion with multiplanar and 3D imaging.
• MRU is an effective alternative to CTU in patients with contraindications to the use of ionizing radiation or use of iodinated contrast agents (as iodine allergy & poor renal function) or frequent follow-ups. A plain CT is recommended in addition to MRU.
Formal guidelines for follow-up after urinary diversion has not yet been established so what we suggest is a follow-up strategy addressing early and late postoperative complications.
An initial radiological assessment in the first three months is advised followed by a constant interval (six months) radiological follow ups.
The choice of the proper imaging modality used varies for each patient depends on inputs from clinical, laboratory & operative data as well as different specifications of each imaging modality.
The role of radiologist includes:
• Pre-operative
Evaluation of the urinary tract to have a baseline evaluation of the upper urinary tract. This would be helpful in monitoring changes that may develop in the future.
• Early postoperative
- Determine the integrity of the diversion.
- Detect any complications such as leaks from the pouch or at the sites of the anastomosis.
• late postoperative
- Assess the capacity of the reservoirs.
- Presence of ureteric reflux
- Monitor upper tract changes.
- Detect potential complications of the procedure.
(Hanna and Badawy, 2009)
The used Imaging studies include:
• Ultrasound is the basic initial study being very useful in monitoring the kidneys and detecting hydronephrotic changes.
• Intravenous urography (IVU) and retrograde loopogramorpouchography were the two classic imaging methods used for evaluating the urinary diversions.
• CTU is a superior alternative to IVU allowing excellent evaluation of the urinary tract and the integrity of the urinary diversion with multiplanar and 3D imaging.
• MRU is an effective alternative to CTU in patients with contraindications to the use of ionizing radiation or use of iodinated contrast agents (as iodine allergy & poor renal function) or frequent follow-ups. A plain CT is recommended in addition to MRU.
Other data
| Title | THE RECENT ROLE OF MR UROGRAPHY IN FOLLOW UP OF URINARY DIVERSION PATIENTS | Other Titles | الدور الحديث لفحص الرنين المغناطيسي للجهاز البولي فى متابعة مرضي تحويل مجرى البول | Authors | Mostafa Mohammed Hassan Ghaly | Issue Date | 2016 |
Attached Files
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| G10855.pdf | 543.93 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Similar Items from Core Recommender Database
Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.