Endoscopic Vein Harvesting versus Open Vein Harvesting in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery bypass Grafting

Romel Barsoum Abdelmalek Barsoum;

Abstract


he saphenous vein used for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedures is traditionally harvested by means of the open technique, as a consequence, lower limb wound complications are an important source of morbidity after CABG, occurring in about 15% of cases. Complications such as hematoma, dehiscence, skin necrosis, or wound infection increase the length of stay and delay rehabilitation, ambulation, and exercise training.
Our study included 80 patients of IHD divided into two groups each group included 40 patients.
Group I, 40 patients were subjected to undergo CABG where LSV was harvested using the endoscopic technique.
Group II, 40 patients were subjected to undergo CABG where LSV was harvested using the open technique.
There was no statistically significant difference as regards the age, sex, BMI, preoperative diabetes and history of smoking.
Regarding intraoperative course, there was no statistically significant difference between both groups regarding number of macroscopic injuries to the vein or length of harvested vein. But, there was a highly significant statistical


Other data

Title Endoscopic Vein Harvesting versus Open Vein Harvesting in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery bypass Grafting
Other Titles إستخراج الوريد بالمنظار مقارنة بإستخراج الوريد الجراحي في المرضى الذين يخضعون لجراحة زرع الشرايين التاجية
Authors Romel Barsoum Abdelmalek Barsoum
Issue Date 2017

Attached Files

File SizeFormat
J7114.pdf164.2 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check

views 10 in Shams Scholar
downloads 8 in Shams Scholar


Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.