Evaluation of the Accuracy of Two Impression Techniques for Angulated Implants
Ola Adel Saied Farrag;
Abstract
The first step in achieving an accurate, passively fitting
implant-supported prosthesis is to reproduce the relationships of
dental implants through impression procedures. It is critical to record
the three-dimensional orientation of the implant as it occurs
intraorally, since imprecise superstructure fit can result in mechanical
and biologic consequences that disrupt the function of dental
implants.
This study was designed to investigate -in vitro- the
dimensional accuracy of 2 different impression techniques on
angulated implants.
Four triangular master models were constructed from cast
acrylic sheets by using a computer software and a laser cutting
machine. For each model, a drilling machine was used to drill 3 holes
25 mm apart arranged in a triangular pattern. Each hole received a
dummy implant where the center implant was perpendicular to the
top surface of the model and the lateral implants were placed with a
10º angluation from the center implant.
The main groups were classified according to the depth of
placement of the implants as follows:
c) Group A: The implants were placed flushing with the top
surface of the model.
d) Group B: The implants were embedded 2mm below the top
surface of the model.
implant-supported prosthesis is to reproduce the relationships of
dental implants through impression procedures. It is critical to record
the three-dimensional orientation of the implant as it occurs
intraorally, since imprecise superstructure fit can result in mechanical
and biologic consequences that disrupt the function of dental
implants.
This study was designed to investigate -in vitro- the
dimensional accuracy of 2 different impression techniques on
angulated implants.
Four triangular master models were constructed from cast
acrylic sheets by using a computer software and a laser cutting
machine. For each model, a drilling machine was used to drill 3 holes
25 mm apart arranged in a triangular pattern. Each hole received a
dummy implant where the center implant was perpendicular to the
top surface of the model and the lateral implants were placed with a
10º angluation from the center implant.
The main groups were classified according to the depth of
placement of the implants as follows:
c) Group A: The implants were placed flushing with the top
surface of the model.
d) Group B: The implants were embedded 2mm below the top
surface of the model.
Other data
| Title | Evaluation of the Accuracy of Two Impression Techniques for Angulated Implants | Authors | Ola Adel Saied Farrag | Issue Date | 2012 |
Attached Files
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ola Adel Saied Farrag.pdf | 782.05 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Similar Items from Core Recommender Database
Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.