A Comparative Study Between Bulk Fill and Conventional Flowable Composites
Basma Yahya Rozza;
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate a bulk fill flowable composite based on the stress decreasing technology and compare it to a conventional flowable one in relevance to degree of conversion, mini-flexure strength and induced cuspal strain during polymerization.
The specimens for DC and mFS were prepared and divided according to the resin composite material used into 2 different groups bulk-fill flowable composite (BFC) and conventional flowable composite (CFC). Each group was further subdivided into 3 subgroups according to the packing technique into 2mm single increment group, 4mm bulk packing group and 4 mm incremental packing group. For each subgroup, half the number of specimens was tested after 24 hours while the other half were tested after 6 months.
The specimens for DC and mFS were prepared and divided according to the resin composite material used into 2 different groups bulk-fill flowable composite (BFC) and conventional flowable composite (CFC). Each group was further subdivided into 3 subgroups according to the packing technique into 2mm single increment group, 4mm bulk packing group and 4 mm incremental packing group. For each subgroup, half the number of specimens was tested after 24 hours while the other half were tested after 6 months.
Other data
| Title | A Comparative Study Between Bulk Fill and Conventional Flowable Composites | Other Titles | دراسه مقارنة بين حشوات الراتنجات المركبة المتسيله المحشوة ككتلة واحدة ومثيلاتها التقليدية | Authors | Basma Yahya Rozza | Issue Date | 2017 |
Recommend this item
Similar Items from Core Recommender Database
Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.