Randomized controlled trial comparing the ® angled Episcissors-60 against straight scissors in assisted and outlet forceps delivery

Osama Abdallah Abdelkhalek Fayed;

Abstract


Introduction: Episiotomy is the surgical enlargement of the vaginal orifice by an incision of the perineum during the second stage of labor or just before delivery and requires repair by suturing.

Aim of work: To evaluate the extent of vaginal and perineal trauma using the angled Episcissors-60 versus straight scissors during assisted forceps delivery. Also, assessment of neonatal outcome including apgar score and neonatal birth trauma.

Patients and Methods: Randomized controlled trial comparing the angled Episcissors-
60 against straight scissors in assisted and outlet forceps delivery. Prospective randomized control clinical comparative trial. Maternity department of Ain Shams Hospital. This randomized clinical trial included 100 women were admitted for vaginal delivery at the labor ward of Ain Shams Hospital. Selection of cases was according to inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Results: Group A: Included 50 women who had low or outlet foreceps delivery with the use of the angled Episcissors-60. Group B: Included 50 women who had low or outlet forceps delivery with mediolateral episiotomy with the use of straight scissors.


Other data

Title Randomized controlled trial comparing the ® angled Episcissors-60 against straight scissors in assisted and outlet forceps delivery
Other Titles مقارنة شق العجان بواسطة مقص شق العجان بزاوية 60 و المقص المستقيم بمساعدة الملقط التوليدى المنخفض
Authors Osama Abdallah Abdelkhalek Fayed
Issue Date 2017

Attached Files

File SizeFormat
J5304.pdf360.98 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check

views 4 in Shams Scholar


Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.