Comparative Study Between Outcomes of Conventional Versus MarsupializedFistulotomy.
HaithamSolimanELsayed Omar;
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose:
The aim of the study was to compare the outcome of patients underwent conventional fistulotomy for perianal fistulae(Lay open technique) versus fistulotomy with marsupilization.
Methods :
Twenty patients (20) with low,non recurrent peria
Purpose:
The aim of the study was to compare the outcome of patients underwent conventional fistulotomy for perianal fistulae(Lay open technique) versus fistulotomy with marsupilization.
Methods :
Twenty patients (20) with low,non recurrent peria
Other data
| Title | Comparative Study Between Outcomes of Conventional Versus MarsupializedFistulotomy. | Other Titles | دراسة مقارنة لنتائج الإسلوب التقليدى لفتح الناصور الشرجي جراحياً مقابل توخيف الناصور الشرجى بعد الجراحة | Authors | HaithamSolimanELsayed Omar | Keywords | Comparative Study Between Outcomes of Conventional Versus MarsupializedFistulotomy. | Issue Date | 2012 | Description | Abstract Purpose: The aim of the study was to compare the outcome of patients underwent conventional fistulotomy for perianal fistulae(Lay open technique) versus fistulotomy with marsupilization. Methods : Twenty patients (20) with low,non recurrent peria |
Attached Files
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Binder1.pdf | 1.4 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Similar Items from Core Recommender Database
Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.