Aortic Root Replacement, Valve Sparing according to Tirone David reimplantation technique versus Bentall’s technique, early post operative outcome

Mohamed Hussein Mohamed Ahmed;

Abstract


The modified Bentall – De Bono procedure is considered the standard approach for the repair of aortic root aneurysm, ascending aortic aneurysm or a type A aortic dissection when accompanied by an incompetent, irreparable aortic valve.
However, the modified bentall procedure also exposes the patient to the problems associated with artificial valves. Mechanical valves, while long lasting, require life-long anticoagulation. Biological valves, while not requiring anticoagulation, expose the patient to the potential need for re-operation in 10–15 years which, in the case of a re-do modified bentall, is a major and relatively risky operation, the observation that in at least half of the patients the native valve cusps are undamaged led to the development of valve sparing aortic root reconstruction techniques.
Operations that replace the aortic root while preserving the valve have been developed by pioneers as Magdi Yacoub (remodelling procedure used since 1979) and Tirone David (reimplantation procedure performed since 1988) in an effort to improve quality of life for many patients.


Other data

Title Aortic Root Replacement, Valve Sparing according to Tirone David reimplantation technique versus Bentall’s technique, early post operative outcome
Other Titles النتائج المبكرة لجراحات استبدال جذر الشـريان الأورطى، مقارنة بين حفظ الصمام الأورطى بطريقة (تيرون داڤيد) واستبدال الصمام بطريقة (بنتال)
Authors Mohamed Hussein Mohamed Ahmed
Issue Date 2010

Attached Files

File SizeFormat
B11001.pdf136.17 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check

views 2 in Shams Scholar
downloads 1 in Shams Scholar


Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.