COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN SUBLINGUAL, ORAL AND VAGINAL MISOPROSTOL AS A METHOD OF LABOR INDUCTION

Yasser Awad Mohamed Soliman;

Abstract


This study was done to compare the safety and efficacy of
50μg Misoprostol sublingually, orally or vaginally 30
pregnant women were included in the study. Results show
that 50μg of sublingual Misoprostol is effective as a
method of induction of labor


Other data

Title COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN SUBLINGUAL, ORAL AND VAGINAL MISOPROSTOL AS A METHOD OF LABOR INDUCTION
Other Titles دراسة مقارنة بین استخدام عقار المیزوبرس تول ع ن طری ق الف م و تح ت اللسان و عن طریق المھبل كطریقة للحث علي الولادة.
Authors Yasser Awad Mohamed Soliman
Keywords COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN SUBLINGUAL, ORAL AND VAGINAL MISOPROSTOL AS A METHOD OF LABOR INDUCTION
Issue Date 2009
Description 
This study was done to compare the safety and efficacy of
50μg Misoprostol sublingually, orally or vaginally 30
pregnant women were included in the study. Results show
that 50μg of sublingual Misoprostol is effective as a
method of induction of labor

Attached Files

File SizeFormat
94220r2063.pdf75.31 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check

views 2 in Shams Scholar


Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.