Randomized Clinical trial Comparing Postoperative Outcomes of early versus late oral Feeding after Cesarean Section

Lobna Salah El-den Khonany Mohammad;

Abstract


C
esarean sections are considered routine procedures and also the most common major hospital surgical procedure performed in the developed and developing world with a low chance of mortality for mother and child (Sean et al., 2010).
Traditionally, patients are not given fluid or food until clinical signs of normal intestinal function return, which is most commonly the presence of bowel sound, a passing of flatus or stool, and the feeling of hunger. The rationale of this practice is to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting, distention and others complications. However, withholding oral feedings may lead to intestinal ileus, which can prolong the length of hospital stay (LOS) and increase the financial burden (Huaping et al., 2015).


Other data

Title Randomized Clinical trial Comparing Postoperative Outcomes of early versus late oral Feeding after Cesarean Section
Other Titles دراسة عشوائية ضابطة لمقارنة نتائج الاطعام المبكر والمتأخر عن طريق الفم لحالات مابعد العملية القيصرية
Authors Lobna Salah El-den Khonany Mohammad
Issue Date 2019

Attached Files

File SizeFormat
CC77.pdf285.8 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check

views 8 in Shams Scholar
downloads 7 in Shams Scholar


Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.