Bone Graft Vs Bone Substitutes in Treatment of Cavitary Benign Bone Tumors
Karim Samir Helmy;
Abstract
Extended curettage is the commonest mode of the treatment of the cavitary benign bone tumors. If a tumor is very large and threatening to involve the joint, complete excision with joint reconstruction may be necessary. Cure rates of 90‑95% have been achieved using curettage as the sole mode of treatment in benign bony lesions. (51, 97) However this treatment is not devoid of controversy and many authors recommend that bone defect after curettage of benign bone tumors should be filled with bone grafts or substitutes such as cement, hydroxyapatite, or tricalcium phosphate. (85)
Autografts are free of disease transmission or immunological reactions and have properties of osteogenesis, osteoinduction and osteoconduction, but are associated with the donor site morbidity (54)
Autografts are free of disease transmission or immunological reactions and have properties of osteogenesis, osteoinduction and osteoconduction, but are associated with the donor site morbidity (54)
Other data
| Title | Bone Graft Vs Bone Substitutes in Treatment of Cavitary Benign Bone Tumors | Other Titles | مراجعة منهجية للترقيع بالطعم العظمي مقابل بدائل العظام في علاج أورام العظام الحميدة المجوفة | Authors | Karim Samir Helmy | Issue Date | 2019 |
Recommend this item
Similar Items from Core Recommender Database
Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.