Dexmedetomidine versus Ketamine-Propofol for Sedation of Obese Patients Undergoing Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Ola Nasser Hussain Zaher;

Abstract


Upper GI endoscopy is a highly accurate diagnostic technique which also provides an opportunity for therapeutic approach. However, it could be painful for patient and it is advised to be performed under procedural sedation.
Typically, diagnostic and uncomplicated therapeutic upper endoscopy are successfully performed with moderate sedation. Deeper levels of sedation may be considered for longer and more complex procedures, including, but not limited to, ERCP and EUS. Additionally, deep sedation or general anesthesia should be considered for patients who have been difficult to manage with moderate sedation and are anticipated to be poorly responsive to sedatives. This includes patients who have had long-term use of narcotics, benzodiazepines, alcohol, or neuropsychiatric medications. The choice of sedative is based on maximizing patient comfort while minimizing risks
Propofol and ketamine are commonly used as sedative agents, and each has advantages and disadvantages.
Propofol is associated with hypotension, loss of airway reflexes, hypoventilation, apnea, and hypoxia but has antiemetic and amnestic properties.


Other data

Title Dexmedetomidine versus Ketamine-Propofol for Sedation of Obese Patients Undergoing Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Other Titles مقارنة بين ديكسميديتوميدين وكيتامين-بروبوفول في تخدير المرضى المصابين بالسمنة الخاضعين لتنظير الجهاز الهضمي
Authors Ola Nasser Hussain Zaher
Issue Date 2019

Attached Files

File SizeFormat
cc1360.pdf461.29 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check

views 1 in Shams Scholar
downloads 1 in Shams Scholar


Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.