A Multicenter Comparative Study Comparing Different Conditioning Protocols (Namely: Cyclophosphamide, Melephalan, Etoposide versus Bendamustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan) in Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation among Egyptian Patients with Hodgkin Disease

Yasmin Safar Abdalla;

Abstract


ost patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) will be cured with standard frontline therapy, but 20% of patients will be refractory or relapse after cytotoxic chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or a combination of the two. Some of these patients may be cured by salvage chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (autoSCT). However, those who have refractory or relapsed disease after autoSCT have poor prognosis with conventional therapies and a median overall survival (OS) of about 25 months. In recent years, outcomes have been improving in the post-autoSCT relapsed setting as new therapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors have emerged for relapsed/refractory cHL (R/R cHL).


Other data

Title A Multicenter Comparative Study Comparing Different Conditioning Protocols (Namely: Cyclophosphamide, Melephalan, Etoposide versus Bendamustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan) in Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation among Egyptian Patients with Hodgkin Disease
Other Titles دراسة متعددة المراكز لمقارنة البروتوكولات المستخدمة (اندوكسان, الكيران, فيبسيد وبندامستين, فيبسيد, أراسى, الكيران) فى الزرع الذاتى للمرضى المصريين المصابين بمرض هودجكين
Authors Yasmin Safar Abdalla
Issue Date 2020

Attached Files

File SizeFormat
BB464.pdf590.35 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check

views 4 in Shams Scholar


Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.