Comparative Study Between Neostigmine Versus Sugammadex in Obese Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery

Ramadan Refaie Bakheat;

Abstract


omplete and rapid reversal of the effects of neuromuscular blocker drugs is a primary element of safety in anaesthesia. Neuromuscular conduction that is not completely improved leads to post-operative residual curarisation and the development of complications that are related to respiration.
The use of neostigmine, which is a cholinesterase inhibitor, is a standard procedure for the reversal of the effect of neuromuscular blockers, but some side effects, such as slowed heart rate, increased secretion and bronchospasm, make its use more difficult. In contrast, anti-cholinergic drugs, including atropine and glycopyrrolate, which are used for preventing these side effects, increase the frequency of arrhythmia and cause blurred vision and sedation.
Sugammadex, which is a new agent for the reversal of neuromuscular blockade, is a modified gamma-cyclodextrin. It forms a complex with rocuronium, removes it from the circulation and terminates neuromuscular blockade.
Sugammadex is a safe agent with a low risk of serious side effects. The high cost of sugammadex, which is one of the most expensive drugs in anaesthesia practice, prevents it from being used as a standard neuromuscular reversal drug. It has been suggested that the cost of sugammadex use in anaesthesia can be reduced by shortening the duration of recovery.


Other data

Title Comparative Study Between Neostigmine Versus Sugammadex in Obese Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery
Other Titles دراسة مقارنة بين النيوستجمين والسوجاماديكس في مرضي البدانة في عمليات مناظير البطن الجراحية
Authors Ramadan Refaie Bakheat
Issue Date 2020

Attached Files

File SizeFormat
BB1533.pdf1.06 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check

views 3 in Shams Scholar


Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.