Glasgow Coma Scale versus Full Outline of Unresponsiveness Scale in Predicting Discharge Outcomes of Traumatic Brain Injury

Eman Bakry Kassem; yassien, sahar; Dalia Ali Amin;

Abstract


Even though, within 40 years since its introduction, the GCS has stayed the cornerstone of initial traumatic brain injury evaluation by out-of-hospital personnel, emergency physicians, trauma surgeons, and neurosurgeons, on the basis of the findings of this study and considering the results of the previous studies, the FOUR scale appears to be an easier tool to use plus it provides a more comprehensive neurological assessment.
In current ICUs, multiple scores are frequently used. Preferably, these scores should be simple, reliable, and predictive for relevant outcomes and/or relevant clinical decisions. The widespread adoption of such a tool may heighten the ability to accurately forecast survivability, impacting the treatment and management of these patients and their families.


Other data

Title Glasgow Coma Scale versus Full Outline of Unresponsiveness Scale in Predicting Discharge Outcomes of Traumatic Brain Injury
Other Titles مقارنة بين قدرة مقياس غلاسكو للغيبوبة والمخطط الكامل لمقياس عدم الوعي فى التنبؤ بنتائج المرضى الذين يعانون من إصابات المخ الرضية عند خروجهم من المستشفى
Authors Eman Bakry Kassem; yassien, sahar ; Dalia Ali Amin
Keywords Traumatic brain injury, Glasgow Coma Scale, Full Outline of Unresponsiveness Scale, discharge outcomes
Issue Date 2019
Publisher Egyptian Electronic Publisher
Journal Evidence-Based Nursing Research 
Volume 1
Issue 4
Start page 3
End page 11
DOI 10.47104/ebnrojs3.v1i4.70

Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check

views 1 in Shams Scholar


Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.