Cemented long versus standard femoral stem in proximal femoral metastasis: a noninferiority single-blinded quasi-randomized clinical trial

Ibrahim Mahmoud Abdelmonem; El Masry, Ayman; Sherif Ishak Azmy; Ahmed Sayed Kotb; Ayman Abdelaziz Bassiony;

Abstract


Background and purpose : Proximal femur is a common site for metastasis, it has a significant impact on patient’s quality
of life, and traditional treatment aims at protecting as much as possible from the femur. However, recent studies have demonstrated increased rate of complications and questioned the need for long stem in this high-risk group. Our purpose is to
determine whether standard-length femoral stem is non-inferior to long femoral stem in the treatment of proximal femoral
metastasis.
Patients and methods: Between 2019 and 2021, we prospectively included 24 patients with proximal femoral metastasis
leading either to impending or pathological fractures (5 and 19 cases, respectively). We included patients with lesions due
to metastasis, lymphoma, or multiple myeloma. Patients were quasi-randomized based on their order of presentation into
two groups based on the femoral stem length, cemented standard (group 1) and long (group 2) femoral stem. Oncological
complications, survival, stem complications, and functional outcomes were recorded and analyzed using SPSS 25.
Results: 24 patients were included in the final analysis, 13 case in group 1 and 11 in group 2, and mean age 57.6 years. Mean
follow-up duration was 10 months, and 11 patients died of the whole-study population with mean survival of (10.85 ± 2.23,
8.82 ± 3.6) months in group 1, 2, respectively. The complication rate was higher in the standard group; however, this difference
did not reach statistical significance. No difference was found between study groups regarding functional outcomes,
except for VAS at 6 months which was higher in standard group.
Conclusion: We believe that the ubiquitous use of long stem in the management of proximal femoral metastasis should be
questioned considering the expected patient survival and low rate of complications associated with the use of standard stem.
Clinicaltrials.gov registration number : NCT04660591.


Other data

Title Cemented long versus standard femoral stem in proximal femoral metastasis: a noninferiority single-blinded quasi-randomized clinical trial
Authors Ibrahim Mahmoud Abdelmonem; El Masry, Ayman ; Sherif Ishak Azmy; Ahmed Sayed Kotb; Ayman Abdelaziz Bassiony
Issue Date Feb-2022
Journal European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 
DOI 10.1007/s00068-021-01875-x

Attached Files

File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
long stem vs short stem.pdf886.08 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy
Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check

views 25 in Shams Scholar
downloads 5 in Shams Scholar


Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.