Cemented versus Cementless Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis)
Islam Saeed Muhammad Ali ELdeeb;
Abstract
ere, in this systematic review; cemented and uncemented UKAs have been shown overall comparable outcomes as regards Cemented UKA has demonstrated good clinical and functional long-term outcomes. However, the commonest reasons for revision surgery in the cemented UKA include aseptic loosening, component dissociation, and pain accompanying routinely noticed radiolucencies surrounding the tibial component. Whereas excellent clinical short-term results for cementless UKA are approved although the elevated risk of impingement and malalignment.
Other data
| Title | Cemented versus Cementless Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis) | Other Titles | رأب نصف مفصل الركبة بمفصل أحادي الركبة إسمنتي مقابل غير إسمنتي (مراجعة منهجية وتحليل بعدي) | Authors | Islam Saeed Muhammad Ali ELdeeb | Issue Date | 2021 |
Attached Files
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BB10493.pdf | 397.63 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Similar Items from Core Recommender Database
Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.