Screening and Confirrmatory methods for detection of Brucellosis in milk of some dairy animals in Behera province
Hanaa Fathi Farag;
Abstract
The difficulty of collecting blood for detection of Brucellosis needed the using of milk and milk serum as easier method on this respect.
In an aim to determine the most suitable test for the diagnosis of
. Brucellosis in milk, a total of 54 milk samples were collected from
Friesian dairy cows belonging to a herd with a history ofbrucellosis.
.J These were subjected to the MRT and ELISA milk test. Whey was separated from milk samples for carrying out WBAPAT, WRBPT, WRiv.T and WELISA test
The ELISA milk test was taken as a reference standard for evaluating
other tests. The sensitivity obtained were (48.148%), (65.52%), (68.97%), (89.66%) and (92.308%) for MRT, WRBPT,WBAPAT, WRiv.T and WELISA
test, respectively.
The specificity obtained were (72.222%), (72.22%), (100.00%), (61.11%)
and (93.75%) for MRT, WRBPT, WBAPAT, WRiv.T and WELISA test, respectively.
The agreement calc'ulated were (48.1%), (59.30%), (70.40%), (68.50%)
and (79.6%) for MRT, WRBPT, WBAPAT, WRiv.T and WELISA test,
respectively. The results of different tests were discussed. It was concluded that the milk ELISA was relatively more sensitive and specific and the WELISA test was a good substitute to the ELISA milk test.
Serum tests as BAPA, RBPT and Riv. T need further investigations to be adapted for whey.
In an aim to determine the most suitable test for the diagnosis of
. Brucellosis in milk, a total of 54 milk samples were collected from
Friesian dairy cows belonging to a herd with a history ofbrucellosis.
.J These were subjected to the MRT and ELISA milk test. Whey was separated from milk samples for carrying out WBAPAT, WRBPT, WRiv.T and WELISA test
The ELISA milk test was taken as a reference standard for evaluating
other tests. The sensitivity obtained were (48.148%), (65.52%), (68.97%), (89.66%) and (92.308%) for MRT, WRBPT,WBAPAT, WRiv.T and WELISA
test, respectively.
The specificity obtained were (72.222%), (72.22%), (100.00%), (61.11%)
and (93.75%) for MRT, WRBPT, WBAPAT, WRiv.T and WELISA test, respectively.
The agreement calc'ulated were (48.1%), (59.30%), (70.40%), (68.50%)
and (79.6%) for MRT, WRBPT, WBAPAT, WRiv.T and WELISA test,
respectively. The results of different tests were discussed. It was concluded that the milk ELISA was relatively more sensitive and specific and the WELISA test was a good substitute to the ELISA milk test.
Serum tests as BAPA, RBPT and Riv. T need further investigations to be adapted for whey.
Other data
| Title | Screening and Confirrmatory methods for detection of Brucellosis in milk of some dairy animals in Behera province | Other Titles | طرق استبيان وتحديد البروسيلا فى لبن بعض الحيوانات الحلوب فى محافظة البحيرة | Authors | Hanaa Fathi Farag | Issue Date | 1998 |
Attached Files
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| B17774.pdf | 1.31 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Similar Items from Core Recommender Database
Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.