Some Modified Methods for Bee Propolis Production in Honeybee Colonies (Hymenoptera, Apis mellifera L.) under Egyptian Condition

Ali, M.A.M;

Abstract


The current study was conducted to evaluate three different types of bee propolis-collection traps in
propolis production in addition traditional method during the experimental period extended from July, 2017
until June, 2018. Two different locations were chosen for this study; New Valley governorate (El-Hindaw
village, Dakhla region) and in Qalyubia governorate (Kalama village, Qalyub region). The results showed that,
(Type2) trap "Hand-cut fiber screens with holes 1 mm." outperformed all other types of bee-collection traps in
terms of the amount of bee propolis produced, followed by (Type 1) trap " Glass slides", then (Type 3) trap "
Hand-cut plastic screens with holes 2 mm", while the lowest amount of bee propolis collected was in traditional
method (hand collection). The results also revealed that, the highest amount of bee propolis collected was in
July with an average of 11.19 and 5.96 gm/colony in the New Valley and Qalyubia governorates, respectively.
Regarding the season, summer season significantly had the highest amounts of bee propolis produced with an
average of 8.46 and 4.87 gm/colony, while the autumn season had the lowest amounts of bee propolis produced
with an average of 1.61 and 0.83 gm/colony in the New Valley and Qalyubia governorates, respectively. It can
be concluded that, the highest annual average of the collected bee propolis /colony was obtained with (Type, 2)
trap 5.68 and 3.57 gm, while the lowest annual average was recorded in traditional method with an average of
3.75 and 1.93 gm/colony in the New Valley and Qalyubia governorates, respectively.


Other data

Title Some Modified Methods for Bee Propolis Production in Honeybee Colonies (Hymenoptera, Apis mellifera L.) under Egyptian Condition
Authors Ali, M.A.M 
Keywords Honeybee, Apis mellifera, bee propolis, bee glue, bee propolis-collection traps, Egypt.
Issue Date Dec-2021
DOI https://doi.org/10.21608/jppp.2021.220177

Attached Files

File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
1.pdf764.83 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy
Recommend this item

Similar Items from Core Recommender Database

Google ScholarTM

Check



Items in Ain Shams Scholar are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.